Bologna Process Al-Hadba University · Quality Assurance DepartmentBologna Process

Annual Quality Assurance Report

Each year the university looks back at the academic year just finished and reports, standard by standard, what was done, what the evidence shows and what will change next year. The report is written on the ministry's template and follows ESG-2015 Part 1.

Download the template ↗ ESG 2015 (PDF) ↗

Published

Annual Quality Assurance and Enhancement Report, 2025-2026

The university's report for academic year 2025-2026 against the ten standards of ESG-2015 Part 1, written on the Bologna Process Quality Assurance Council template. In 2025-2026 the Bologna Process ran in 12 of the university's 29 accredited curricula.

  • 12 / 29curricula under the Bologna Process
  • 1,526undergraduate students on the Bologna track
  • 223modules taught under Bologna
Covers
Academic year 2025-2026 · issued 2 October 2026
Prepared by
Quality Assurance Department
Framework
ESG-2015 · QAC

Read the report (PDF, 12 pages)

The loop the report closes

  1. PlanProgramme outcomes, module descriptions and the QA policy set the targets.
  2. DoThe year is taught, assessed and recorded on the platforms.
  3. CheckStudent feedback, audits and the performance indicator are read against the targets.
  4. ActThe report names the improvements carried into next year's plan.

How a report is built

  1. 1DepartmentFills the template for its programme and attaches the evidence from QMS.
  2. 2College QA unitReviews the department reports and merges them into a college report.
  3. 3QA DepartmentChecks the claims against the platforms and writes the university report.
  4. 4PublicationThe approved report is filed with the ministry and published on this page.

Readiness checklist

The ten standards and where their evidence lives

Tick a standard once its evidence is in place. Ticks are kept in this browser only, as a working aid for whoever is drafting the report.

0 / 10 standards evidenced

  1. 1.1

    Policy for quality assurance

    Whether the policy was applied this year, and what was revised.

    Evidence kept onQA Policy
  2. 1.2

    Design and approval of programmes

    Programmes designed or revised, and their approved outcomes.

    Evidence kept onProgramme catalogue ↗
  3. 1.3

    Student-centred learning, teaching and assessment

    How teaching and assessment matched the module descriptions; student feedback.

    Evidence kept onModule descriptions ↗
  4. 1.4

    Student admission, progression, recognition and certification

    Intake, progression and pass rates; credit recognition; Diploma Supplement.

    Evidence kept onQMS ↗
  5. 1.5

    Teaching staff

    Academic performance indicator results (65 / 20 / 15) and staff development.

    Evidence kept onQMS ↗
  6. 1.6

    Learning resources and student support

    Laboratories, library and e-learning; guidance and support services.

    Evidence kept onQMS ↗
  7. 1.7

    Information management

    Which data was collected, by whom, and how it was used in decisions.

    Evidence kept onCurriculum matrix ↗
  8. 1.8

    Public information

    What was published about programmes, outcomes and results.

    Evidence kept onThis site
  9. 1.9

    On-going monitoring and periodic review of programmes

    Internal audit findings and the actions taken on them.

    Evidence kept onInternal audits ↗
  10. 1.10

    Cyclical external quality assurance

    External reviews and accreditation activity during the year.

    Evidence kept onAccreditation ↗